The Leaky Boat Of American Political Class Corruption – Home and Away

  • November 15th, 2011

I am constantly amazed at the amount of corruption that tends to follow our political class around, both on our domestic shores and overseas. Consider a story that appeared in the September 24, 2010 issue of The Week Magazine entitled, “The Fight Against Corruption In Afghanistan.” According to the article:

- Afghan President Hamid Karzai has recently blocked several investigations of graft in his administration.

- There have been ongoing complaints of corruption related to members of his government including his two half brothers who are allegedly involved with drug trafficking, bribery, and smuggling cash out of the country.

- Karzai recently freed one of his senior aides from prison who had been arrested on corruption charges.

- A recent in-country survey in Afghanistan found that 70% of those Afghans surveyed said that their local government officials are engaged in drug trafficking.

In return for this web of corruption and deceit from the Afghan government, the United States taxpayer expends roughly 0 billion a year and many dead American soldiers trying to get this situation right. Who should one be more mad at, the Afghan government officials and crooks who get away with this theft or the American political class that allows them to get away with it.

Another article on foreign corruption of U.S. taxpayer money comes from a New York Times article that appeared in the St. Petersburg Times on September 26, 2010, “Corruption Gobbles Up Gifts To Children.” This article reviewed a program that the U.S. political class put in place to get almost 8,100 laptop computers into the hands of Iraqi children. The computers’ value was estimate to be .8 million. The laptops arrived in Iraq last February but were not distributed right away.

While trying to track them down, it became known that in August, 4,200 of them had been auctioned off by some Iraqis for ,700. The location of the other 3,900 computers was unknown at that time and still unknown today. Now, the article does acknowledge that ten government-employed customs people have been arrested in this case. However, seven months after the taxpayer funded computers landed in country, not a single on has been distributed to an Iraqi child and the location of the computers has apparently not been determined.

These are just two of the myriad of corruption instances that the American taxpayer has paid for in both war zones, Iraq and Afghanistan. And, as always, there does not appear to have been any person in our government or political class held accountable for the corruption and the waste. From 0 billion a year we waste in Afghanistan supporting a thoroughly corrupted government down to the relatively small, but symbolic loss of .8 million of laptop computers in Iraq, we are left with the classic political class situation: everyone is in charge but no one is accountable.

But I guess we should not be too upset that taxpayer dollars are being wasted via corruption half a world away. Consider just a sample of political class corruption examples we have faced domestically in recent years:

- Hawaiian Senator Daniel Inouye has been accused of using the leverage of his Senate office to coerce government regulators to bailout a distressed Hawaiian bank in which the Senator had made a significant investment, an investment that would be lost if the bank was allowed to fail like the regulators wanted.

- Congressmen James Traficant, Randy Cunningham, and William Jefferson have been found guilty of various corruption violations and have served or are serving prison time.

- Many former Illinois governors have either spent time in jail (Kerner and Walker), are serving time in jail (Ryan), or are trying not to go to jail (Blagojevich).

- California Congresswoman Maxine Walters is accused of doing the same deal in order to save a bank that her husband had heavily invested in.
New York Congressman Charles Rangel is likely to go on trial later this year in Congress for his alleged misdealings and corruption in many areas.

- Florida Congresswoman Ginny Waite Brown was reported by the Associated Press to have been trading stocks in financial institutions at the same time she was sitting on a House committee that would determine which financial institutions got how much government/taxpayer bailout money. For most Americans, this is called insider trading and is a felony. For political class members this is called business as usual.

]]>

- Many of President Obama’s nominees for high level government positions were found to have not paid their fair share of taxes including Tom Daschle, ex-long time Senator, and Tim Geithner, currently the Secretary of the Treasury. Again for most Americans, this type of tax evasion is at least a misdemeanor. For the political class, it sometimes feels like it is a way of life.

- The government organization that runs Medicare is so rife with corruption and mismanagement that it wastes, loses, and misspends almost 0 billion a year in government/taxpayer funds.

- Various Associated Press reports have reported that employees in the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Interior Department and most recently in the Defense Department (The Week – September 17, 2010) have been extensively involved, on work time and on government computers, in searching and downloading pornography off of the Internet. The latest Defense Department pornography finding identified over 250 Pentagon employees and contractors, some with the highest security clearance, had viewed and purchased child pornography, sometime with their government issued computers. This form of corruption at best involves the misuse of government salaries dollars and equipment, at worst sets up users of pornography for blackmail and other forms of corruption.

When the Democrats took control of the House Of Representatives in 2006, newly appointed Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi, stated that she would lead “the most honest, most open, most ethical Congress in history” and that she wanted to “drain the swamp” of Congressional corruption. Part of this effort was a bill signed by President Bush called the “Honest Leadership and Open Government Act” in 2007. Parts of this bill called for disclosure of lobbyists’ spending and contributions to politicians, a ban on lobbyist gifts to lawmakers, curtailment of free vacations from lobbyists, creation of an independent ethics office, and the identification of earmark sponsors.

While sounding great, the ethics bill and the push to root out corruption has fallen short, according to a recent Associated Press article:

- It appears that few in Congress are disclosing how lobbyists are helping them raise campaign cash for their re-elections even though there is a provision in the above law that requires them to do so.

- Even though the ethics office that was created by the above bill has found grounds for misconduct with two Democratic members of Congress, Maxine Walters and Charles Rangel, Pelosi will probably be able to delay their House trial until after the November elections. You cannot say you are fighting for good ethics if you use your power to postpone possibly embarrassing ethics violations and investigations for political gain.

- Recent news reports show that three Democratic members of Congress awarded Congressional Black Caucus Foundation scholarships to their relatives. Talk about conflict of interest and a serious ethical violation, in spirit if not law.

- While the 2007 ethics law that Bush signed required earmarks to be identified by lawmaker, it obviously did nothing to curtail earmark creation and waste since they are close to an all time high. Earmarks are nothing more than thinly disguised ways for the political class to direct taxpayer money to entities that turn around and give some of that money back to the lawmaker for his or her re-election campaign, i.e. it is a giant kickback scheme. In essence, the shell game of having taxpayers pay for incumbents’ re-election campaigns is as healthy and as destructive as ever, it is just now we know who is doing the destruction.

- Recently, an influential former lobbyist, Paul Magliocchetti, pleaded guilty to funneling more than 0,000 to the re-election campaigns of three House Democrats. This 0,000 cash for incumbents cost the American taxpayer 7 million – this is the amount of defense contracts that the three Democratic Congressmen directed towards Magliocchetti’s clients.

- Beyond the above ethics violations involving money, Pelosi could be considered in serious breach of ethics as leader of the House Of Representatives on many fronts. She has allowed members of her party to call American citizens, with legitimate differences of opinion with the Democrats actions and positions, racists. Pelosi herself called Americans opposed to Obama’s health care plans un-American even though those Americans have a right to disagree with any politician. While she censured a Republican Congressman who called Obama a liar during a health care reform speech (even though the Republican apologized and his apology was accepted by the President), she had no problem with one of her fellow Democrats calling all Republicans “knuckle dragging Neanderthals.” You cannot be considered an ethical person if you do not respect the opinions and rights of others to have those opinions. She should know better, she is a leading political figure in the country. However, her behavior in berating common citizens is unethical and despicable. 

Thus, while Pelosi is taking credit for a law that is supposed to reduce corruption, a law that was signed by a Republican President and passed with wide Republican support, the fact is it does not make any

The Insanity of Nigerian Political Class

  • December 25th, 2010

On the 19th day of the month of May 2011, I was coming from the bank in Wuse 2 Abuja the capital of Nigeria, I saw a woman sitting down under the sun with two children, one sucking her breast and the other sitting down and watching the mother as the mother was crying calling on anybody who care to listen to her. She was begging for arms from anybody that pass by. When I was about passing she said brother if you do not want to help me please in the name of God give me something for the sake of these children they are your children. On hearing that, I turned and looked at her and I gave her some money despite the fact that I was not having enough money that day.

What came into my mind was what the Nigerian political class thinking is about? The answer is simple; the insanity in their heads cannot allow them think well because an insane person is an insane person and cannot think beyond the capacity of an insane person.

The insanity in the head of the Nigerian political class do not allow them to think well, the Nigeria political class has one thing in common, their own concern is on how to get elected into the office and keep remaining in the office. They amend the law, kill the citizens they have made the Nigeria people face and kill each other just because they want to remain in the office. They have created big class inequality and do not see anything bad in taking up the whole resources that belong to the whole masses.

Nigeria of today is a country where nothing works. The failure of our leaders is over whelming. The leaders are not ready to put in their best, the aftermath effect is that the state and its people are at quake and political eclipse has taken over the state and its people. The prevailing situation in Nigeria where the richest people seem to be those who cannot be described as really hard working people but those who have looted money in public office or have connection with government, people’s perception of hard work is that it does not pay since one does not need hard work to succeed but needs to succeed only when one loots. It is believed in Nigeria that career advancement and subsequent economic and social elevation do not depend on how hard you work but on whom you know, where you come from and the amount you loot in office. A country like Nigeria where mediocrity, nepotism, quota system, ethnicity, religious bigotry, have taken over the state cannot be identified as a country in the league of Nations that practice DEMOCRACY.

The looting of public funds and the wasteful spending among our leaders has made them to do anything to stay in office unless the constitution makes it impossible for them to run. The leaders who had enjoyed the looting of public funds had made several attempts to manipulate the constitution and to contest election again and continue stay in office. Politicians in Nigeria are mostly concerned in pursuing their political career instead of giving good governance to the people.

How often have we smiled at our leaders, while in our minds we wept for ourselves, reviewing all vagaries of life and broken pledges and faithlessness galore our leaders are known for? How can we believe government, DEMOCRACY and GOOD GOVERNACE in Nigeria when our leaders have denied us the right to exist as members of the society, without apologizing to us? One of the unfortunate things about DEMOCRACY in Nigeria and GOOD GOVERNANCE is not that the leaders and the politicians do not know what is right, but they always choose to do wrong thing.

Nigerian leaders and politicians should know that to regard politics as a demonic zone, free from God’s influence is a distorted vision of a divine providence, an unwarranted infringement of divine sovereignty.

Democratic government which the ruling class oligarchy pretends to produce, claim that their legitimacy stems from the authority of the people and their rule is based on the consent of the masses. The political system benefits the ruling class oligarchy who is the microscopic few at the expense of larger population.  The application of force by the ruling class oligarchy on the masses to gain support (legitimacy) has become inevitable since they know they have failed the masses, and on the free will of the masses they will not be in the office and be regulating the government and the state.

If Nigeria is so democratic and the ruling class enjoys their support from the masses as they claim, why do they maintain fearsome crack units of the police and the armed forces for their protection?  Why is the larger proportion of the national wealth expended on bullets than bread? Why are the enemies which the security forces are paid to ferret out located among the people, within the civilian population? Why are the security forces devouring the society which created them? Why has it become imperative that military personnel in mufti must melt as much as they can in the crowd, forming the inner corps of a cordon between leaders and the led? Why are the leaders scared of those whom they govern, preferring the comfort of bullet proof vests to the pleasure of living among the people? Does a democratic leader need a long motorcade of dispatched riders in his movement from home to office and vice-versa?

The answer to these questions lies in what Professor Chinua Achebe says about power. Power does not only entice, intimidate, and subdue, it may also incite to resentment and rebellion. It is not the repression, torture, and brutality, which a government unleashes on the people that are democratic. It is the mass incitement to anger and rebellion against the savage administration of government by violence that enacts the first face of democratic development.

Nigeria is not a democratic society partly because the people themselves have not yet reciprocated elitist violence against the leaders. The false image of our nation which we in the  darkness hour  of our tribulations appropriate  unimaginatively from outside sources, does not abort the  reality of our existence as a nation where power is directed by miscreants, pirates and  adventurers to the accumulation of private fortunes. Nigeria is at present neither democratic nor great. It is one of the most disorderly nations in the world; she is one of the most corrupt, insensitive, inefficient places under the sun. She is one of the most expensive countries and one of those that give least value for money.

]]>

According to Achebe, tourists who intend to enjoy peace and leisure by visiting Nigeria must reconsider their decision for their own interest. Only a person seeking to know punishment and suffering at the first hand should choose Nigeria a tourist state. No, Nigeria may be a paradise for adventures and pirates, not for tourists.

The real explosive potential of social injustice in Nigeria does not reside in narrow jostling among the elites but in the gargantuan disparity of privilege they have created between their tiny class and the multitude of ordinary Nigerians.

Democracy scarcely exists in a situation where a minority of unproductive parasites in government and business enjoy subsidized housing, free access to official cars,  free shopping frees abroad and illegitimate  perquisites such  as  uncontrolled acquisition  of state land, procurement of market  stores  under a fictious names for  rental to genuine traders, procurement for the resale of government subsidized commodities. These invisible emoluments consolidate the institutionalized robbery of the common people of Nigeria by their ruling class.

Dele Giwa showed how the Nigeria situation of institutionalized robbery of the nation, by a tiny class of powerful elites, has degenerated to such anarchic proportions that nobody cares any more. To him, people seem to accept the unacceptable revelations of politicians sharing billions of naira belonging to the nation. The newspapers report them and the televisions speak about them, but people just laugh, they laugh because they have been shocked to the state of unshocability.

Nigerians in the main now regard themselves as passing sojourners on the geographical amalgam call Nigeria. It is like standing away at a distance and looking as spectators at the greatest inferno in the world. Nigeria is on fire and the citizens are amused. One hundred billion naira was shared and so what? Nigeria is perhaps the only country in the world where such revelation has lost the power to shock because the leaders do that often and on and the masses are no longer surprise hearing that.

Mass political apathy is not an inherent feature of human society, especially the democratic setting we are claiming. It is rather the outcome of prolonged effect of the destructive forces of socio-economic alienation, which has attained its peak in the militarized environment in the society. In Nigeria, militarism has transformed the citizens into obedience and docile Philistines who are not only apathetic but are arrogant of their difference and subservience. What else do we expect from the people, especially when it is remembered that those of them who dare to expose the secret channels and hidden connections with which those who govern guarantee their persistence of their pilfering culture, stand a good chance of being eliminated.

At this point, the issue is what is to be done to get the political elites and the ruling class to care, to show some little care to fatherland, to get a National consensus on what to do to those who pillage the fatherland.  What is to be done to get Nigerians to the terms with the country and not feel like passing sojourners who have other countries to turn to? How do we create a democratic society? Or how long can we remain infinitely patient in the face of unbearable conditions in